okay, now time to comment on the anti-apocalypse action.
one example about it is Lee Hui Min's blog - http://whenwedanced.blogspot.com

first comment - " it's NOT on the news "
okay, now how would you react now if they show that the world is gonna end on 21st December 2012 on the news? you're gonna panic and not take life seriously. would people want that? the economy will turn, and etc etc.

next she gave a link - http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2007-03-27-maya-2012_N.htm?csp=34.
a quote - a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in.
well, sure, and the mayans, a poor african clan payed scientists tons to play along with them, SURE THING!

another quote - University of Florida anthropologist Susan Gillespie says the 2012 phenomenon comes "from media and from other people making use of the Maya past to fulfill agendas that are really their own."

so in other words, their saying the mayans are attention seeking people. geddalife. they are famous already.

lets see a contradicting quote from tt web - Maya civilization, known for advanced writing, mathematics and astronomy, flourished for centuries in Mesoamerica, especially between A.D. 300 and 900. Its Long Count calendar, which was discontinued under Spanish colonization, tracks more than 5,000 years, then resets at year zero.

so their saying that the mayans were already well-known, yet they wanna be well-known. OKAYYYY?

and for the closing sentence of the post, we just wanna say that we refrain from vulgarities as a form of getting people to believe it.


okay, our 'job' is tough. who wants the world to end? so 9 out of 10 news articles say its fake. so automatically, there will be more anti-apocalypse2012 to pro-apocalypse2012. so AUTOMATICALLY, there will be more flames to pro-apocalypse2012, which is us. so we want you to know that you can flame all you want, but we wont bother countering it.


-junhui